{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/presentation/3/context.json","id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/iiif/fj29883m0q/manifest","type":"Manifest","label":{"en":["News Reel Film #3 DUB"]},"logo":"https://d9jk7wjtjpu5g.cloudfront.net/organizations/logo_images/000/000/053/original/cropped-marmia-logo-copy1.png?1586173104","metadata":[{"label":{"en":["Publisher"]},"value":{"en":["MARMIA"]}},{"label":{"en":["Agent"]},"value":{"en":["WJZ-TV (Television Station: Baltimore, Md.)"]}},{"label":{"en":["Date"]},"value":{"en":["1969-01-01"]}},{"label":{"en":["Description"]},"value":{"en":["Use for Vogel News Film Reel #3 DUB to 3/4\"  Date is a guesstimate"]}},{"label":{"en":["Format"]},"value":{"en":["video"]}},{"label":{"en":["Identifier"]},"value":{"en":["WJZ-UNKN-152-002"]}},{"label":{"en":["Subject"]},"value":{"en":["WJZ-TV (Television Station: Baltimore, Md.)"]}}],"summary":{"en":["Use for Vogel News Film Reel #3 DUB to 3/4\"  Date is a guesstimate"]},"provider":[{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/aboutus","type":"Agent","label":{"en":["MARMIA"]},"homepage":[{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/","type":"Text","label":{"en":["MARMIA"]},"format":"text/html"}],"logo":[{"id":"https://d9jk7wjtjpu5g.cloudfront.net/organizations/logo_images/000/000/053/original/cropped-marmia-logo-copy1.png?1586173104","type":"Image"}]}],"thumbnail":[{"id":"https://d9jk7wjtjpu5g.cloudfront.net/collection_resource_files/thumbnails/000/162/487/small/thumbnail_162487_1668302347.jpg?1668302357","type":"Image","format":"image/jpeg"}],"items":[{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487","type":"Canvas","label":{"en":["Media File 1 of 1 - open-uri20220712-508-2suiow.mp4"]},"duration":3607.213,"width":640,"height":360,"thumbnail":[{"id":"https://d9jk7wjtjpu5g.cloudfront.net/collection_resource_files/thumbnails/000/162/487/small/thumbnail_162487_1668302347.jpg?1668302357","type":"Image","format":"image/jpeg"}],"items":[{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/content/1","type":"AnnotationPage","items":[{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/content/1/annotation/1","type":"Annotation","motivation":"painting","body":{"id":"https://aviary-p-marmia.s3.wasabisys.com/collection_resource_files/resource_files/000/162/487/original/open-uri20220712-508-2suiow.mp4?1657652435","type":"Video","format":"video/mp4","duration":3607.213,"width":640,"height":360},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487","metadata":[]}]}],"annotations":[{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969","type":"AnnotationPage","label":{"en":["AUTO_TRINT_WJZ-UNKN-152-002 [Transcript]"]},"items":[{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/1","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"And it seems to me that at the level of city council that, you know, this is not the high echelon, the Supreme Court, where the most basic kind of position we are involved basically, and most of it is business people and attorneys and whatnot. So I think that to have a broad, sweeping, ethical ruling that inhibits our participation often does the reverse of what is desired. You know, we go underground. It is possible through legal devices and whatnot to work around this law anyway. Well, are you going to resign? Are you going to stay on the council? Just what is your status? Well, I have been planning on resigning for a considerable period due to the various pressure of my inability to keep up with all the hearings, the demands on and responsibility that I have. Since we have a public corporation. The fact I think the councilman needs to stay with the people and relate and I'm being called away. And I certainly don't want to ever be in a position of not doing a good job. So this has been part of my problem, the matter of a conflict of interest, just sort of add life into the cake, so to speak. It just leaves me in a quandary as to the most responsible kind of thing that I could do and yet be good at whatever I'm going to end up being. Why not fight for anyone else? How do you feel on a day like this? I'll tell you. This hotel has had a great tradition and a lot of people have been coming here for many, many years and they're going to miss I mean, they've been coming in for the last few days, and a lot of people can't believe that they're really close enough.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=72.75,213.34"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/2","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"So I told them I really need hotels, you know, more than anything else. Well, are you going to miss the Hamilton? Oh, yeah. I. How many guests are left? And how many would you say we? I got five in Iraq over there and. But not that nine, nine or ten means you have close to 400 empty rooms. NEWHART Yeah, that's my different. Is that a little sad for you? It is, yes, because I enjoyed working here. A lot of nice people, you know. And it was just by and I enjoyed coming to work, even though so many nice people, you know, came in here every day, you would see some of the same people every week, you know, just regular to get you know, they come in today, couple days, maybe one day, but you see them quite often. Oh, I suppose. I haven't told anyone. I haven't talked to anyone. And as far as this resolution being introduced, do you know what it calls for? Yes, I'm aware of what it calls for. How do you feel about it? Well, I have no comment at this present time about the resolution that they want be introduced. When do you think you will talk with them? I have no comment about that either at the present time. Is it a likelihood that somebody else might introduce it? There's I don't know. I can only speak for myself. Do you know that you will not introduce it? I have no comment on that either. Anything you'd like to say about the entire situation? No, I would not. The fact that you were elected by city council rather than constituents, does that change your attitude towards your actions within that body? No. I am a representative of the people of the fourth District in the city of Baltimore, in the state of Maryland.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=214.3,378.8"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/3","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"And I will always vote with with that in mind, the best of the city speaking technically, if they ask you to introduce a resolution, regardless of what it calls for, are you duty bound as a councilman to introduce it? Well, and as you talking about duty bound, if there's a request is the request by the if a group or organization or many organization to request a different light on the story by the state before. I have no comment on this whole issue. Do you know of any reason why they continually use your name rather than somebody else from council? No. You have to ask them. Well, Jerry, I'm not guilty and no comment. You must have some feeling one way or another that somebody would bring a charge against you like this if you feel you're not guilty. No comment. Were you surprised at any way of hearing this? There had been some talk that the investigation was underway. Were you surprised at all? Still no comment, Jerry. I have an attorney. My attorney is Bill Edison, and he'll answer all the questions for me at this time. Okay. Were you aware that there was an investigation going on at all in the city government in some respect? I know I was told, but I didn't know who and they never said I was being involved at any time. But you say you're not involved. Not guilty. That's right. One reason we feel this way about this resolution is because they have two city councilman who certainly are making laws who are under an indictment, the same as Mr. Ellison, but yet they are still able to sit in the city council. So we feel that he should be able to maintain his job until a decision has been made by the court.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=379.43,922.13"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/4","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"And what happens if the council rejects your idea for bringing that resolution out of committee? Well, I don't think they want to go against the mayor's decision since the mayor was the one to have suspended him. They are reluctant about going against that decision. But we're going to push the issue and see that they do one way or the other. What do you mean by that? If they vote for a resolution or they vote against it one way or the other, we'll be going to see the mayor either to vote for or against it. Eventually, though, you'll be directing your pressures at the mayor. That's right. The mayor is the one who has to make the decision. I think that you'll find a man that served and served his country, particularly on the battlefield, is more concerned about peace than the man that hasn't. Now we want a lasting peace. I think the big difference is the whole world wants peace, but we want a lasting peace. Now, these people are saying get out of Vietnam. They don't they don't even begin to understand what the commitment is in Southeast Asia, for example, where there's an insurgency. That means there's people there trying to overthrow recognized government. For example, in Thailand. They love their king, but yet there's a group of people trying to overthrow him. Now, an insurgent has no ability to produce his own arms or munitions, yet he's got them. And isn't it strange that they're produced by the Communists? So it means that the Communists are there to overthrow them. Now, a quick escalation of withdrawal is going to lose Vietnam. Every military leader and Asian expert will tell you that. But if we allow Vietnam to have a stabilized army, it'll have a stable government.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=923.06,1018.52"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/5","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"This will prevent the domino theory from being effective and appeal the domino theory that it's kind of virtual. But ask the Southeast Asians. They'll tell you that it's realistic. Well, I don't want to put words in anyone else's mouth. I would say that Mr. Shriver is the best man to talk to at this point. He's back in the country, as I understand. And so I would think that he is the one best able to answer that question. Well, you were up. I was I tried to the opinion that he was not, but that was when he was over in France as the ambassador. If he's back here now, I think it's I think the best the response would be from the man himself. You changed your opinion on this at all? Well, let's put it this way. I'm not I'm no longer willing to go out on a limb, whereas I was finally going on a limb to predict that he wasn't going to run. Have you heard something we haven't heard? No, I haven't. No, as a matter of fact, I haven't heard as much as you heard. I think the real answer is where the Pentagon is making its cuts now. I don't think that we should be spending 15 billions of dollars on 3000 overseas bases supporting a quarter of a million man plus dependents in Germany 25 years after World War Two, when we're cutting off our own bases and laying off persons back here in the United States, I think that the area to cut is in those 3000 overseas bases. I think many of them are surplus. There have been countless congressional reports criticizing the utility of a great many of them. I think when you're spending 15 billions of dollars supporting troops outside of Vietnam and the overall areas across the globe, I think that's where the cuts should be made.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=1019.45,1135.05"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/6","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"Not laying off persons at Fort Holabird, the Intelligence Center or Fort Meade or gunpowder down in Indian Head. And I fight for cuts in the overseas spending last year and I intend to do so again this year. Well, tomorrow we think it's symbolically to close down the draft board. So starting in the afternoon, we're going to have a group of, for the most part, draft eligible young men who are going to enter the draft board to avail themselves of their legal rights. We intend to go and examine files which registrants have given us permission to look at. We intend to go in and ask secretaries their questions about our own draft status and about the functioning of the draft lottery. And we intend also to involve the employees of that Selective Service system in dialog concerning the war, concerning our own feelings about why we are entering the draft board and trying to, in essence, close it for the afternoon. It started when several plainclothes men started pulling out certain girls from the auditorium in the halls. I understand a couple of these girls had been suspended as a couple had been suspended. These were the same ones who had suffered in the last incident and were. And then the after they grabbed the girls, then other girls started protesting and started yelling for them to get their hands off so that these girls wouldn't jump on them. They started spraying mace and tear gas all over the place. And after that, then that's when the disorder really started coming on. And like the policemen, they were beaten. One girl so badly that some of the other girls started beating on this policeman in order to get him off of that girl. Well, you have a better relationship between the two things and the teacher.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=1136.06,1326.02"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/7","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"Races up there and they just do things that they want to do. They need the students to have some say in what's going on in the school. I think that's the whole problem. Do you think the students are trying to cooperate? They haven't tried, but their demands have been met. So that's the whole problem. What demands do you feel are most important now? Well, we want a grievance committee, but we don't want the faculty to pick who they want on. We want the students to choose who they want on this committee. And have you gotten anywhere with this? Well, we have a committee set up, but still, we don't have who we want on the committee like they picked who they want. We didn't even know. You know, they don't know what's going on in the school. The Nixon administration has responded with the logical extension of his law and order campaign that he was elected on, which means using federal troops to bust the strike. We think this is an abysmal method of trying to solve the just grievances of the postal workers. What would the alternatives be when people who perform a vital, necessary service walk out? Well, we feel that there are legitimate, concrete solutions, and that's why we're calling the conference, for instance, with respect to the postal workers. If a federal post office paid for itself, if all the mail paid for itself, they would have, instead of a $1.3 billion deficit, they would have enough money to give every federal postal employee a 1500 dollars a year across the board wage increase. These are the kinds of solutions that we know exist that the Nixon administration just they just can't come up with these solutions. But the solutions have to be found and they have to be applied to these real problems that we face.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=1329.74,1448.59"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/8","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"We have not had any extensive discussion with our faculty and I believe the same is true on other campuses about whether there should be a change in the admissions policy. Now, I can say that it seems to me that there may be a stage at which we might go to an open door policy. I wouldn't be ready to recommend that, certainly at this time. But the important thing is that the individual student we know pretty well his chances of getting a college education with the background that he brings to us. I don't think we do any service to anyone by admitting a person who is not likely to succeed in a normal manner once they get on the campus. So what you're saying and then if there is a change in the admission policy in favor of an open door policy, it will not lower the standards in no way here. You know, I haven't found any tendency on anybody's part to feel that the standards for graduation should be lowered. And I don't think that a change in policy would tend to be logical if that is the approach. Some do it once taxes hit the same people that have to pay the real estate tax and they are just what they referred to as nuisance taxes in most cases. I think there's probably 20 or 30 proposed there to make up their deficit. And of course, it's just 20 or 30 more nuisances. The unfortunate that anyone ever has to use them. If the local governments had proper tax structure, if the people in the state would give them proper taxing authority, those nuisance taxes would be unnecessary. And the only thing that we're doing by the strike, as we are doing by having the tents out in front of the library, is an attempt to build up an awful lot of people out and visibly, which will embarrass the university and force those few people who are capable of making the decision, and in particular, Dr.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=1453.89,1586.37"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/9","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"Gordon, to come around and make a decision. The extent of the success of the strike will be dependent upon getting a lot of people out visibly actually joining, not just striking, but actually joining others in the marches and in the picket line and that sort of thing. Professor Glover You know, I'd just like to say we're going to win on these issues. Whether or not the strike is effective or not, we think the strike is becoming effective. We're just starting really to organize today. Some teachers have already called off classes. We have three or 400 people milling around who are in favor of our position. But we've got to win on these issues because it's immoral to have the military on campus. It's immoral to have Hopkins number one defense contractor of all universities while the Vietnam War in the killing is going on. And we will win because finally the faculty will stand up and say we should not be a military accomplice in this war, and the students will finally stand up and say that. And if they don't, then we will win anyway on the basis of nonviolent militant action on this campus. My reaction to that is that on Friday afternoon, just a week ago, at about this hour, I proposed that this issue be resolved by a referendum. There were some details which were different than from what they are now. If anybody had suggested a quiet negotiation about details, I would have been happy, happy to do that. What was decided last night was not a referendum, but it certainly opens the way toward one. It was decided that if the Dean elect and I understand that there have already been many representations to him during the day, which suggests that in fact the precondition will be fulfilled and therefore that this issue will be decided that way.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=1586.7,1699.14"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/10","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"To that extent, since there was a demand for an immediate decision I refuse to make. I've been accused by various people of equivocation on that subject. I don't think there was any equivocation. The answer was no. To that extent, I think the events of the five or six days in between, including the what seemed to be a clear threat to Occupy Holmwood House, an injunction which was considered offensive by many people, the withdrawal of the injunction, the negotiations, the strike, the picketing yesterday, a number of episodes at the at the entrances to the campus. All of these were unnecessary because the substance of what was agreed last night could have been agreed peacefully a week ago as afternoon. The scene inside the dreary, often noisy courtroom has been anything but calm. Yesterday, Thomas Raimondi, the defendant, emotionally insisted that his attempts to bribe State Senator John Bishop were a hoax and that the entire performance he engaged in 18 months ago was nothing but a charade. When he took the witness stand yesterday before the defense request for a mistrial, Raimondi testified in a breaking voice. At one point, he broke down altogether, weeping. He had to leave the stand. At another point, he angrily accused Senator Bishop of being a liar and to climax yesterday's proceedings, Raimondi exploded at the prosecution with question, yelling at Assistant State's Attorney Joseph Kiehl. I'll kill him. I'll swear I'll bust him wide open, Raimondi cried out after Mr. Carl questioned a character witness about Ramos disappearance as a defense witness in a 1963 mail fraud case. Raimondi is charged with offering Senator Bishop, a Republican from Baltimore County, 75 to $100000, to deliver at least 25 of the 33 GOP votes in the General Assembly in the legislative election of a gubernatorial successor to Spiro Agnew.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=1700.07,1828.79"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/11","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"Baltimore County executive Dale Anderson was named in testimony as the candidate. Raimondi was trying to get those votes for William Adelson. Raymond, his former employer, a political lobbyist and lawyer, was named as the middleman in the bribery scheme. Raimondi said the two men were innocent and that he used their names to try to get back at Senator Bishop, but not supporting him in his unsuccessful bid for Congress in 1968. Christopher Gaul, Eyewitness News. Thomas Raimondi told the court today that his offer to buy Republican votes was a hoax, his voice breaking. The defendant said he wanted to dangle Republican State Senator John Bishop on a string because Raimondi said Bishop failed to help him in his unsuccessful bid for Congress in 1968. Senator Bishop claims Mr. Raimondi offered him between 75 and $100,000 to deliver at least 25 of the 33 GOP votes in the General Assembly. When the legislature met January 7th, 1969, to choose a successor to Spiro Agnew. Baltimore County executive Dale Anderson was named in testimony yesterday as the gubernatorial candidate for whom Raimondi was seeking support. William Adelson, a powerful political lobbyist in Baltimore, a lawyer, was named as the middleman in the bribery scheme. Raimondi broke down on the witness stand when his lawyer asked why he used Adelson's name weeping. Raimondi said Adelson, his former employer, was innocent of any involvement in the dealings with Senator Bishop. The Republican legislator from Baltimore County was a regional campaign manager for the Nixon Agnew ticket, and Raimondi charged that Bishop's lack of support for his congressional candidacy prompted the defendant to initiate what he called this charade. Later, under cross-examination, Raimondi angrily called Senator Bishop a liar, although he admitted he had approached the legislator in a bribery attempt that he declared was a figment of his romantic imagination.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=1829.69,1955.94"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/12","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"Christopher Gaul, Eyewitness News at the Baltimore Criminal Courthouse. Okay. Well, that's a very good question because we originally didn't favor a referendum. This referendum was forced upon us because the administration made an agreement with the strikers. At that time, we were informed we were in a standing committee and they agreed that a referendum would be held on the issue. We originally believe that there is no question because since the university is open, all groups should be allowed to be on there, whether a majority of papers it or not. But now that there is a referendum, we are compelled to vote the military recruiters back on campus and and then accord them no more nor less privileges than any other group that is on campus or is allowed to come on a campus. Well, I don't think very much of it. I must say universities have changed a lot since I was a professor. Used to be believed that a university was a place, a bastion of freedom, where all points of view were respected and tolerated and protected. And now we have a group on university campuses who apparently feel that a university is a place where only their point of view can be tolerated. I think it's the job of the university presidents and boards of trustees to let these people know that they're not going to put up with that. As long as there's any body, respectable group on a campus that wants to do something, even if it's a minority. I think it ought to be permitted to go on recruiting for Marines or know operations for ROTC are certainly a legitimate activity. That's a legitimate point of view. And no place that can call itself a university would ban. That's a point of view from the campus, and it is expected from today's rather ponderous proceedings.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=1957.23,2076.639"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/13","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"Embezzlement trial of suspended Community Action Director Frank Tell US will not be a short one. In his opening statement to the all female jury, including two female pundits, state prosecutor James Dudley questioned the trial would be time consuming and involve a large number of witnesses. He said he would prove that Frank Kelso had personal responsibility for the riot relief account and that the Community Action Commission had no knowledge of any transactions. The state's first witness was Community Action Commission Chairman Clarence Blount, who provided that he, in fact had no knowledge of any transactions on the account. The state then called two officials of the Union Trust Company Bank to verify that the only person is authorized to sign any checks on the account were Frank Ellis and Commission Chairman Jerome Powell. Late in the afternoon, the defense and the prosecution decided to evaluate all the records to be used in the case and would stipulate what could or could not be used as evidence. At this point, the trial was recessed until 10:00 tomorrow morning where it's expected the prosecution will continue its case from the steps of the courthouse. This is Ralph Murray, Eyewitness News. It was a hushed courtroom. But listen, a suspended family chief, Frank Ellis, testifying in his own defense, explained the disbursement of the bulk emergency fund. He said that in every case, the check was issued for persons who came to him as a result of an emergency, and he did not understand why anyone would think he was a thief. After being assigned the responsibility for administering a $21 million program, is that due to his heavy workload? It was impossible to remember every case where he had written a check, but he didn't keep more accurate records because he wanted to avoid red tape.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=2077.699,2177.67"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/14","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"He did recall several occasions, one in which he said he took several hundred dollars in cash to two hospitalized victims of a fire. But when he learned that visiting hours was over, he gave the money to a third person identified as a volunteer social worker. As his testimony concluded, Mr. Ellis examined each check individually and denied that he had received any personal benefit from any of the funds, that the only benefit he derived was knowing that one person's emergency situation had been alleviated. The cross-examination of prosecutor James Dudley from the courthouse. This is Ralph Murray, Eyewitness News. Well, first of all, we were completely surprised. We've always had excellent relations with the local police at Northern District. We've always gotten police service when it was needed. And frankly, I've never heard of the police refusing to respond to a call because they thought it was too dangerous. And if a neighborhood is not safe for police, then for whom is it safe? Was that your understanding in talking to the various police officers that night that it was a matter of policy, that they wouldn't send a car into the neighborhood? Very definitely. I couldn't get any impression as to the extent of this area or how long the order had been in effect. But the officer told me that the lieutenant and communications told him that they would not send a car into that area, and then later made this novel specifically and personally confirmed that that he would not respond by sending a car into that neighborhood. Did he offer any reason why they wouldn't send a car into the neighborhood? The officer with whom I spoke in the office of the Chief of patrol said they would not send the car into the neighborhood because it was a gray area with racial problems and that they were afraid the car would be hit by rocks or bottles or overturned, which I found somewhat ludicrous since we've never had any of that problem in the area.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=2178.51,2319.73"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/15","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"Well, I think you in the first place, you have to be stern in the in the sense that keeping order is the primary job of government and we can't allow ourselves to fall into disorder. And arson on a campus is still arson. Mayhem on a campus, it's still mayhem. And I think that those who commit these acts just guarantee the defeat of their own cause. But at the same time, I've talked to hundreds, if not thousands of students in the past two weeks, and I have uniformly found them to be reasonable in their approach, to be sincere in their concern, to be loyal to the American system and want to work within it. And I think that this is the spirit that we have to encourage, and this is the spirit that we we should be sympathetic with. I'm not in my own judgment. I'm feeling is that most of the leadership for violence, not for protest. I recognize that a number of people want to protest peacefully, but they have been concerned about the movement of the war and the Cambodian, that this has inflamed the campuses all over the country. But the leadership toward violence and the movement to politicize completely the university, not only this university, but other universities, has come from a highly radical element. And in my judgment, that part of them are from the inside and part of them are from the outside of the university. I know part of them are from the outside. I don't know where all of them come from. I don't know whether this is highly organized. It is. But I suspect that it is organized from outside of the university as well as from inside the university. And it's something that the university is going to have to cope with in the future.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=2325.16,2552.45"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/16","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"And I'm sure that this board and all of us concerned are going to have to have a great deal of attention how we deal with those people who want and advocate violence on the campus, disruption in order to get anything that they might want. The people in you are saying don't matter. I just was saying that the university is not geared for this. I think it has got to make somewhere else. I've got to say that I think it has made Americans happy. We are in trouble. Situation. I don't think there's any question, as many have said, George Galston included many times, that violence begets violence and that when you put frightened young individuals in the kind of position that these young guardsmen were, and there was the talk and the fear of an incident that the kind of thing that happened at Kent State would happen. I don't blame the young guardsmen when the investigation the federal government is now undertaken and when the other investigations are completed, it will be a complete absence and fault, a dereliction of duty on the part of the National Guard commander on the campus, General Canterbury, and General Sylvester Corso, who permitted man to go into a situation of that kind. Well, you've had a chance to observe the Maryland National Guard in action in College Park. How would you assess the way they've handled it? Well, all over the country, from what I've heard, Maryland has become the model for how to handle a situation like existed at the state of Maryland. These are always volatile and dangerous situations. General Warfield I did have an extremely competent job. I regret, as I heard just a couple of days ago, that the state police were critical of some of the tactics used there with not a greater show of force that these gentlemen say.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=2553.47,2669.49"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/17","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"I think that General Warfield knew exactly what he was doing. I think if we'd had that same situation in the state of Ohio, we would have averted a tragedy. While there is a war on our own streets and there's urban rot in our ours. But I can assure you that this administration in Annapolis has undergone the agony of priorities. And I can assure you that this administration knows where it wants to go, knows where it's going, and we will not be distracted from its goal of a better Maryland. I'm quite excited about it. I am. Of course, you have mixed emotions. You're wondering whether you want him to be governor. And I guess I do. I feel that he's done an outstanding job in the year and a half that he's been governor. I feel that he tried to do his best. And so far it looks like the programs are working out and. I'm quite proud of them. But for you, it means another three, four years at least, of being a public person. Are you do you want to be that? That's what I've been for the past 20 years. So I guess it just means that you have to work a little harder and you have to give more of your time and so much more of your personal life. But I love the state of Maryland, and I feel that the state of Maryland needs a good governor, a strong governor. And I certainly feel that my husband's been that. He never did call me a bigot. He says that as a result of his calling me this, I instituted this investigation. The fact of the matter is that I had nothing to do with instituting or inspiring the investigation. The Department of Audit was making a routine audit of his agency, and during this routine audit they came across this pond and they investigated it.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=2670.36,2890.03"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/18","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"And after they completed their investigation, they brought it to my attention. And of course, after that, it was sent over to the state attorney's office. It seems clear to me that what Mr. Ellis was doing in desperation is to try to make a racial issue out of a situation where no racial issue belongs. They have joined extremist fanatic elements in Maryland and indeed across the nation in offering financial support to candidates who would run against me and carry the national gun lobby banner. They flooded our state with slick publicity, half truths, deliberate lies. In order to create the impression that my proposal would abolish hunting as a sport or interfere with the law abiding citizens right to own firearms. Even though these propagandists know that I personally, personally am a dedicated sportsmen and hunter, they falsely allege that I favor confiscation of all firearms, including law abiding citizens. But some of my friends have told me to trim my sails on a gun issue to play it down. Well, I think the need to reduce crimes of violence, the need to reduce the easy access of guns and crime to the criminal element is too important. A year or two ago, I met with Maryland representatives of the national gun lobby. And the clear indication I received at that time was that if I didn't want the all out opposition, that I would have to completely drop my legislation. And I might say that I have never had the opportunity, I've never been invited, never given the opportunity to speak before any sporting group which is controlled by the Maryland representatives of the national gun lobby. Never been given an opportunity to express my opinion. Never been given been given an opportunity to write my side of the legislation and their gun magazines and their gun publications.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=2890.45,3048.67"},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/19","type":"Annotation","motivation":"transcribing","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"It's always one sided, always distorted, full lies, half lies and an effort to completely mislead the sportsmen of Maryland.","format":"text/plain"},"target":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487#t=3050.2,3060.79"}]},{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969","type":"AnnotationPage","label":{"en":["English [Transcript]"]},"items":[{"id":"https://marmia.aviaryplatform.com/collections/948/collection_resources/76289/file/162487/transcript/38969/annotation/20","type":"Annotation","motivation":"subtitling","body":{"type":"TextualBody","value":"https://d9jk7wjtjpu5g.cloudfront.net/file_transcripts/associated_files/000/038/969/original/open-uri20220712-1146-a5s2t1?1657664817","format":"text/vtt","language":"en"},"target":"https://d9jk7wjtjpu5g.cloudfront.net/file_transcripts/associated_files/000/038/969/original/open-uri20220712-1146-a5s2t1?1657664817"}]}]}]}